Policy Roundup 6.19.23
Introduction
Causes - powered by Countable - provide millions of advocates an intuitive understanding of pending legislation and streamlines the communication process with lawmakers, enabling advocates to influence voting decisions effectively. Advocates can also sound off on issues of national, local, or personal importance: policy, news, campaigns, and more.
As the only advocacy software to also run a community that consistently engages, Causes gives Countable a unique perspective. We get first-hand insights into what advocates think about and discuss, and we're passing these insights on to you.
In this policy roundup, we’ve gathered the latest bills advocates are talking about as well as highlighting comments from the advocates themselves.
BILL: Expand the Accessibility of Federal Food Assistance? - EATS Act of 2023 - H.R.3183
The Bill
H.R.3183 - EATS Act of 2023
Bill Status
- Introduced by Rep. Jimmy Gomez (D-CA) on May 10, 2023
- Sen. Kristen Gillibrand (D-NY) is introducing companion legislation in the Senate.
- Committees: Senate - Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry
- House and Senate: Not yet voted
- President: Not yet signed
Bill Overview
- This bill will permanently expand Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) eligibility to millions of college students experiencing hunger. It seeks to amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 by removing certain eligibility disqualifications restricting otherwise eligible students enrolled in higher education from participating in SNAP.
- Under the COVID-19 public health emergency, temporary exemptions were in place to aid students, but those provisions expire on June 11, 30 days after the expiration of the emergency measures.
- The bill would take effect on Jan. 2, 2024.
What's in the bill?
Addresses food insecurity among student populations
- Research from the Hope Center for College, Community, and Justice found that food insecurity impacts 39% of students at two-year institutions and 29% of students at four-year institutions.
- Students of color are disproportionately impacted: 75% of Indigenous, 70% of Black, and 70% of American Indian or Alaska Native students experienced food and housing insecurity.
Permanently removes barriers and expand access to SNAP
- It would remove the burdensome "work for food" rules for students needing additional food assistance.
Eliminates barriers to accessing SNAP related to students' place of residence
- Currently, the Food and Nutrition Act contains provisions that can disqualify students who live on campus from accessing SNAP simply because they reside at an institution of study.
What advocates are saying:
Yes support.
But republicans only do investigations so I doubt it passes. I would like to know what my congressman has done for me nothing. He just another rich republican protecting his money. Let's start investigating some republicans if your just going to keep wasting tax dollars. y
Definitely expand food access.
BILL: Ban Gas Stoves Amidst Health Concerns? - Gas Stove Protection and Freedom Act - H.R.1615
The Bill
H.R.1615 - Gas Stove Protection and Freedom Act
Bill Status
- Introduced by Rep. Kelly Armstrong (R-ND) and Dan Newhouse (R-WA): March 17, 2023
- Committees: House - Energy and Commerce
- House and Senate: Not yet voted
- President: Not yet signed
Bill Overview
- On Feb. 1, 2023, the Department of Energy (DOE) proposed an "energy efficiency standard" for gas cooking products. The proposed rule would require energy performance standards for gas stoves and seeks to replace them over time with electric alternatives. The law would ban stoves that consume over 1,204 British thermal units annually.
- This bill prohibits the Consumer Product Safety Commission from using federal funds to regulate gas stoves as a banned hazardous product.
- It also blocks the Commission from enforcing product safety standards that prohibit the use or sale of gas stoves or substantially increase their price, making them less competitive.
What's in the bill?
Criticizes New York's ban on future propane and natural gas stoves
- Starting in 2026, New York will phase out all-natural gas stoves and furnaces in new builds amid growing research on methane's climate and health impacts.
- Eleven city attorneys general from Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New York, Rhode Island, Oregon, Vermont, D.C., and Washington submitted a letter to the Consumer Product Safety in support of their investigation into gas stove safety.
Blocks rule that would limit access to gas stoves
- Prohibits DOE from finalizing a proposed rule that would limit consumer access to gas kitchen ranges.
Fights against new energy performance standards
- According to the sponsors, the proposed energy performance standard would eliminate 95% of gas appliances currently in commercial and residential use.
Focuses on consumer choice
- The bill states that there has been increasing momentum to disincentivize and forbid the use of natural gas stoves which curbs consumer choice and cripples manufacturers.
What advocates are saying:
Nope.
There should be other solutions presented instead of just banning gas stoves.
BILL: Should the U.S. Leave the World Health Organization? - WHO Withdrawal Act - H.R.79
The Bill
H.R.79 - WHO Withdrawal Act
Bill Details
- Introduced by Rep. Andy Biggs (R-AZ) on Jan. 9, 2023
- Committees: House - Foreign Affairs
- House & Senate: Not yet passed
- President: Not yet signed
Bill Overview
- The bill requires the president to immediately withdraw the U.S. from the World Health Organization (WHO). It prohibits the use of federal funds for WHO projects.
- The bill also repeals the 1948 act authorizing the U.S. to join the WHO.
What's in the bill?
Withdraws the U.S. from WHO
- It will prevent taxpayer dollars from being used to fund the organization. According to the Illinois Freedom Caucus, the U.S. has sent over $4 billion to WHO since 2010.
Establishes U.S. autonomy over public health protocols
- It will allow U.S. health authorities to determine protocols, warnings, and safety plans for future pandemics and health emergencies.
What advocates are saying:
No!
This must be opposed!
Being members of the world, we are part of a larger community, not living in isolation.
COVID should have shown us we live in a global society; if problems are not addressed globally, they will persist. Being a part of the World Health Organization allows us a global voice in more significant health issues. Does the voice also cost money? Of course, it does, and that money is well spent.
No.
Since pandemics are world wide problems, we should remain in contact with the other peoples of the world to combat them.
BILL: Increase Social Security Benefits for Public Sector Workers - Social Security Fairness Act of 2023 - H.R.82
The Bill
H.R.82- Social Security Fairness Act of 2023
Bill Status
- Introduced by Rep. Garret Graves (R-LA): March 9, 2023
- Rep. Abigail Spanberger (D-VA) is the lead Democratic sponsor
- The bipartisan bill had seven original co-sponsors and currently has 197 co-sponsors
- Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means: March 9, 2023
- House and Senate: Not yet voted
- President: Not yet signed
Bill Overview
- The bill would ensure that public sector employees like firefighters, police officers, teachers, and their families, receive full Social Security benefits regardless of other benefits they are entitled to receiving.
- The bill would repeal provisions that reduce Social Security benefits for individuals already receiving other benefits, like a state or local government pension.
- The changes proposed in the bill will be effective for benefits payable after Dec. 2023.
- The Social Security Fairness Act would repeal the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) and the Government Pension Offset (GPO) from the Social Security Act. Both provisions were aimed at reducing high payouts and retirement windfalls.
- The bill is identical to the Senate version of the bill, the Social Security Fairness Act (S. 597), reintroduced by Sens. Sherrod Brown (D-OH) and Susan Collins (R-ME) on March 1.
What's in the bill?
A fairer way of calculating payments
- When calculating payments, Social Security only takes into consideration covered employment.
- When an individual is employed by a non-covered, public sector employer that does not pay into Social Security, it appears that they have a much lower income and reduces the benefits they are entitled to.
Eliminates the Windfall Elimination Provision
- The bill eliminates the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP), enacted in 1983, which reduces Social Security benefits for individuals who received a pension from a job in which they did not pay Social Security taxes.
- WEP impacts approximately two million Social Security beneficiaries.
Eliminates the Government Pension Offset
- The bill will also eliminate the Government Pension Offset (GPO), enacted in 1977, which reduces Social Security benefits for spouses and widows who already receive a pension of their own.
- The offset currently impacts approximately 780,000 retirees.
What advocates are saying:
What about those of us out here almost bankrupted by interest rate increases, by inflated prices on almost everything we need to survive.
Millions of seniors depend on money that will meet the need of daily living. Millions of us need to be considered too. Many were also public servants when we worked snd contributed. I hope you thought about us and are writing legislation for us. Retirement is not easy street any more like it used to be. Come live with some of us to see what is REALLY going on.
Yes.
There's no reason that public sector workers should receive less in Social Security benefits than other Americans, so I can support this.
Social Security is NOT enough, and nobody should be relying it for all their income in their senior years, but it should be distributed fairly and equally to all citizens who pay into it and qualify for this income.
Thank you!
I've been an educator over 27 years, but have worked other jobs, as well. I have enough credits to collect social security, however my benefits will be severely reduced because of my career path. I support this bill, as it is fair.
BILL: Should We Reduce Online Privacy in Fight Against Child Abuse? - EARN IT Act of 2023 - S.1207
The Bill
S.1207 - Eliminating Abusive and Rampant Neglect of Interactive Technologies Act of 2023 or the EARN IT Act of 2023
Bill Details
- Introduced by Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) on April 19, 2023
- Co-sponsored by Sens. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) and Richard Blumenthal (D-CT)
- Committee: Senate - Judiciary
- House - Not Yet Voted
- Senate - Not Yet Voted
- President - Not Yet Signed
Bill Overview
- Reintroduced from previous sessions, the legislation incentivizes the tech industry to take online child sexual exploitation seriously.
- The bill removes blanket immunity for violations of laws related to online child sexual abuse material (CSAM).
- It amends Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which states that users are legally responsible for the content they upload and not the platforms themselves.
- Service providers and platforms will now be responsible for helping to combat child sexual exploitation and to eradicate CSAM.
- The bill establishes a National Commission on Online Child Sexual Exploitation Prevention that will be responsible for developing voluntary best practices.
- It will also provide recourse for survivors and tools for enforcement.
What's in the bill?
Establishes a National Commission on Online Child Sexual Exploitation Prevention
- The Commission will consist of the heads of DOJ, DHS, and FTC, along with 16 other members appointed equally by Congressional leadership.
- These members will include representatives from law enforcement, survivors and victims' services organizations, constitutional law experts, technical experts, and industry leaders.
Repeals Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act
- Passed in 1996, Section 230 clarified the responsibilities of online platforms and users online. Under the bill, users are legally responsible for the content they upload and not the platforms they use to upload.
- Section 230 helps guarantee free speech and digital privacy online and protects users from censorship.
- Currently, all online platforms are automatically given Section 230 protection — the EARN IT Act seeks to change that.
Creates a set of "best practices"
- Online platforms will have to abide by a set of "best practices" in order to "earn" Section 230 protection. The best practices would require tech companies to build "backdoors" into their encryption schemes should the government demand access to unencrypted user data.
- In the fight against child abuse, the bill would target encryption, ultimately impacting online privacy and security for all users and citizens.
Involves Congress in monitoring
- Federal law already requires that providers report any CSAM they find to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC). The NCMEC is already receiving nearly one million reports per month.
- Congress will have a more active hand in compelling platforms to monitor and report on user data.
What advocates are saying:
I don't fully support this bill ass written.
However, I believe it can be tweaked to give victims full protection and an investigation that is thorough. Humans who intentionally hurt others, most especially hurt children, should not have ANY right to privacy.
I support protecting children online, but am not sure how much privacy we should give up.
This seems like the "personal responsibility" that Republicans are always ranting about when it comes to sexual activity.
If parents aren't capable of protecting their children from the dangers online, then why should the rest of us sacrifice for them?
Yes!!
Any action that will help safeguard children from any form of abuse needs to be taken-PERIOD!!!!!!
Table of Contents
Bill: Expand the Accessibility of Federal Food Assistance?
BILL: Ban Gas Stoves Amidst Health Concerns?
BILL: Should the U.S. Leave the World Health Organization?
BILL: Increase Social Security Benefits for Public Sector Workers
BILL: Should We Reduce Online Privacy in Fight Against Child Abuse?
Share this
You May Also Like
These Related Stories

Policy Pulse 7.17.23

Policy Roundup 7.3.23
